Unlocking the Hidden Potential: Observing Web3 Security from First Principles

The Web3 landscape is rapidly evolving, and with it, the security threats targeting smart contracts. While established best practices remain crucial, effective audits require going beyond the standard toolkit. This article delves into underutilized techniques that empower auditors to find vulnerabilities and ensure the robustness of Web3 applications.

Beyond Tool Outputs: Understanding Semantic Intent

While automation is crucial in Web3 security audits, relying solely on automated tools can leave vulnerabilities undetected. Automated tools are valuable, but their outputs should not be the sole basis for judgment. Auditors need to go a step further and analyze the intended semantic meaning behind smart contract functionality. This involves:

Understanding the Project’s Goals

• Familiarize yourself with the project’s purpose and the intended behavior of its smart contracts.

Decomposing Functionality

• Break down complex contracts into smaller, more manageable units to grasp their logic and interactions.

Analyzing Code Comments and Documentation

• This is not an optional step but a valuable part of the audit process. If available, consult code comments and supporting documentation. They can provide crucial insights into the developer’s intent, potentially uncovering hidden vulnerabilities in code and documentation discrepancies.

By critically evaluating tool outputs in the context of semantic meaning, auditors can more readily discern true and false positive cases:

Example

A tool might flag a function call as “suspicious” based on a generic pattern. However, by understanding the function’s intended purpose, you might recognize it as a legitimate interaction within the context of the smart contract.

Analyzing the Bigger Picture: Context is Key

Many security tools and unit tests focus on the narrower level of individual functions. However, vulnerabilities often arise from the interplay between functions and their interactions within the broader contract ecosystem. This gap between the micro and macro views of the project can be a hiding spot for smart contract vulnerabilities. Here are some ways an auditor can consider the broader view:

Inter-Contract Dependencies

• Analyze how different contracts within a project interact. Can a flaw in one contract be exploited through another?

State Variable Management

• How are state variables managed across contracts? Are there potential inconsistencies or vulnerabilities arising from their interactions?

Data Flow Analysis

• Trace the flow of data throughout the contract system. Are there unintended side effects or manipulation possibilities?

By considering the bigger picture, auditors can identify vulnerabilities that wouldn’t be apparent by examining isolated functions.

Example

A function might appear secure in isolation, but interacting with another function within the same contract could create a re-entrancy vulnerability.

The Ecosystem Effect: Thinking Beyond Your Code

Smart contracts don’t operate in a vacuum. They exist within a complex ecosystem of existing and unforeseen external code, including code that has not yet been written and deployed. A crucial question for auditors to consider when examining a project is: What are the potential attack vectors that could arise from unforeseen interactions? Auditors need to factor in this broader context when assessing security:

Interactions with Existing Contracts

• How will the smart contract interact with established protocols and applications within the blockchain ecosystem? Are there known vulnerabilities within these external applications that could be exploited?

Unforeseen External Interactions

• The future of the blockchain space is constantly evolving. Consider potential interactions with future protocols and unforeseen external code that might be deployed later.

Attack Vectors from External Code

• Can a malicious actor leverage external code to exploit vulnerabilities in your smart contract?

By proactively considering the ecosystem and potential future interactions, auditors can identify vulnerabilities that wouldn’t be apparent by solely focusing on the code itself.

Example

A seemingly secure lending protocol might have a vulnerability that allows a malicious attacker to manipulate an external oracle contract, leading to the theft of user funds.

In summary, auditors should consider the projects they review at multiple levels, from individual functions to smart contract interactions within and beyond the project. By combining these underutilized techniques with established best practices, auditors can better understand smart contract functionality and uncover vulnerabilities that might otherwise be missed. This holistic approach is critical for ensuring the security of Web3 applications and safeguarding user funds within the ever-evolving blockchain ecosystem.

About Olympix

Olympix is a pioneering DevSecOps tool that puts security in the hands of the developer by proactively securing code from day one.

Join our beta program to fortify your smart contracts and proactively shield them from exploits in the evolving Web3 security landscape.

Connect with us on:

Twitter | LinkedIn | Discord | Medium | Instagram | Telegram | Substack